UEFA has affirmed that the decision to reject Julian Alvarez’s penalty was accurate following an inquiry from Atletico Madrid.

In a statement released on Thursday, UEFA addressed the controversial incident that unfolded during the UEFA Champions League clash between Atletico de Madrid and Real Madrid. The focus of the discussion was the disallowed penalty kick taken by Julian Alvarez, which has sparked considerable debate among fans and pundits alike.

UEFA confirmed that Atletico de Madrid had sought clarification regarding the decision to disallow Alvarez’s penalty. The governing body explained that, although the contact was minimal, the player inadvertently touched the ball with his standing foot before making the kick. This detail was highlighted in a video clip shared by UEFA, which illustrated the sequence of events leading to the contentious ruling.

According to the current regulations outlined in the Laws of the Game, specifically Law 14.1, the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) was obliged to inform the on-field referee that the goal should be disallowed due to the double touch. This ruling has raised questions about the strict interpretation of the rules, particularly in instances where the double touch appears to be unintentional.

In light of this incident, UEFA has announced plans to engage in discussions with FIFA and the International Football Association Board (IFAB) to explore the possibility of reviewing the rule. The aim would be to assess whether adjustments should be made for cases where a double touch is clearly unintentional. This move could potentially alter the landscape of penalty decisions in future matches.

As the footballing world awaits further developments, the debate surrounding the interpretation of the rules continues to intensify. Many are calling for a more lenient approach to such incidents, highlighting the need for clarity and fairness in officiating.